Skip Navigation

320 east 57th

Started by johnjim
over 18 years ago
Posts: 28
Member since: Feb 2008
This prewar on 57th in Sutton Place has 12 units listed for sale or in contract. The total units in the building are 96, so does 12 seem high? Any reasons to question this building? Prices seem good. Units for sale are both on the north and south sides (lines A-F). Thanks.
Response by johnjim
over 18 years ago
Posts: 28
Member since: Feb 2008

Now there are 14 units for sale (including a combination). Any comments on this building? Any comments on this block of 57th street between First and Second Avenues.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kanodianikhil
over 16 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Jan 2010

Hi JohnJim, Did you ever get any feedback on your questions above?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jm2010
about 16 years ago
Posts: 10
Member since: Nov 2009

Heard that 2 years of maintenance has to be held in escrow for a minimum of 2 years is opening ante to get to talk to the Board. Make sure you ask in detail about this before making a bid or signing a sales contract.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by streeteasystalker
over 14 years ago
Posts: 102
Member since: Jan 2007

Moreover, the landmark scrollwork and single pane windows prohibit both through-wall and window AC units. Watch out for this one– Hadies on the A and C lines drag the entire building's prices down.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Brooks2
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2970
Member since: Aug 2011

and it get;s Hot, hot, hot in the summer with no AC in the main room..

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Brooks2
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2970
Member since: Aug 2011

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/27348-sale-at-320-east-57th-street-4a

Long time sitting, eh? Fortunately for the sellers, they get to keep the $90,000 deposit on that April 2010 contract.

Sometime between April and the scheduled July closing, the would-be buyers realized the apartment had insufficient AC, single-pane windows that wouldn't permit window units, and the building didn't permit through-wall units. "Realized," forsooth, after ponying up $90,000.

Anyway, they didn't show up for the closing and sued to cancel the contract. In her decision the judge explained what "caveat emptor" means, how "ordinary intelligence" is presumed, and told the sellers to keep the $90,000 with her blessing.

The decision is at http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2011JUN/3001097232010002SCIV.pdf for you fans of human folly.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
over 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

If I were obsessed about apartments in a part of Manhattan, it wouldn't be Sutton Place.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
over 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

I do happen to be especially partial to the Rip Van Winkle Bridge in Columbia County.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
over 14 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

There it is again...from hater to lover.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
over 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

Do the right thing.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by romtsia
over 13 years ago
Posts: 7
Member since: Aug 2011

Why is maintenance so high in this building?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment