Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

375 West End Ave #3cd

Started by bela
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 183
Member since: Jul 2008
Discussion about
Did anyone see this apt? Seems well priced?
Response by West81st
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

Haven't seen it yet. Two red flags on the price:

1) It would be far and away the priciest public-record sale in the building (never a good thing);
2) If you look at the sum of the parts, it doesn't look great. The back third of this apartment is #3C, a 1BR that probably comps out under $700K in the current environment. I think that means the current ask on #3CD reflects $2MM for #3D and the work to combine the apartments. That seems like a lot for six rooms(I think - might be five) on the third floor facing West End.

Not a terrible price, but I very much doubt they will get it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mpaltrow
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 8
Member since: Feb 2009

Saw it on Sunday.

It is a tremendous amount of space that will suit a large family well. For the size the kitchen is quite small and can't be easily fixed. I think if the seller were motivated, this could move in the 2-2.25 range.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 407PAS
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1289
Member since: Sep 2008

Not another join. I think it is time to start the New York Chapter of the Society Against Joined Apartments. SAJA. These things rarely make sense for anybody in the market for an apartment. I have probably rejected ten of the ones I have looked at, and now, I don't even bother to set foot in them. Maybe some day, the sellers will get a clue.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 407PAS
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1289
Member since: Sep 2008

By the way, don't people in one bedrooms or studios deserve a place to live? Must everything get gobbled up into white elephant super-joins? Ridiculous.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bela
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 183
Member since: Jul 2008

west81st; i agree you your logic on the price. I happen to like the layout.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

I think C&D were originally one apartment - so I don't the combo stinks. However, the current owners did not combine it in a very intelligent way. Would have worked much better with eat-in-kitchen at the back, living & dining at the front. 4 bedrooms in between. BTW, zoned for PS87 - which is worth something to us breeders. Despite forecast, the private school admissions season is not working out well for a lot of parents. Nice to be zoned for a good public and keep re-applying in off-years.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by RE_PRO
over 16 years ago
Posts: 161
Member since: May 2009

What do you mean when you said "private school admission season is not working out well for a lot of parents"?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 16 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

A lot of people were hoping that the recession/depression would mean easier private school admissions than in the past. Didn't happen this year.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by RE_PRO
over 16 years ago
Posts: 161
Member since: May 2009

I heard from RE agents that people are flocking from private to public schools. I don't know if that is true or not.. is it?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 16 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

They are, but there's not enough flocking to make that much of a dent in applications to private schools. What is fueling the public school crowding is NOT parents choosing to go public rather than private, it's the baby boom. There are simply more kids entering K than ever before in Manhattan. School overcrowding has long been the norm in other boroughs but Manhattan parents squeal louder.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 16 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

What we're seeing (there's a good article in latest issue of NYMag about this) is the clash between parents who want an excellent (ala Westchester/LI burb) public school education in the city. That hasn't been the mandate of NYC's DOE for a few generations, if ever. To some extent, this has happened before when neighborhoods gentrified (witness creation of G&T programs, citywides) but never to this degree. This baby boom has been 5+ years in the making. I'd say half of the kids who went to preschool with my daughter will move, but that still leaves the other half.

I am repeating myself but the fact is people are holding out in their 3k+ 2br rentals in the city because they're not going to cut monthly costs by moving to the burbs. So there's an impasse. If it becomes absolutely impossible for their children to get any kind of education in the city, they will move. But not until the sh*t actually hits the fan.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

10023, you forgot the i.

and your commentary is spot on. we have one family leaving, and five entering for next year, and it's not a big entry year for our school. i think they want some robustness in case things get worse and more people need to leave. but there is still a huge amount of demand. 10023, do you have handy the number of private school ISAGNY (or whatever it is) k spots available yearly in the city? I think it's something around 1000 spots. just like the real estate world, it's a small market and not much distress can roil it around but good.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 16 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Heh, I can turn any thread into a thread about kids and schools. No clue about the K numbers - I saw 2500 in print at some point.

Catholic schools are looking mighty tempting for this atheist family. Sotomayor is a product of an all-Catholic education.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 16 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

#3CD closed on 9/1/-0 for $2.2MM, which was also the final ask. Bravo to Mpaltrow for pegging the price.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 16 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

"on 9/1/09", that is.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walterh7
over 16 years ago
Posts: 383
Member since: Dec 2006

W81..."#3CD closed on 9/1/-0 for $2.2MM, which was also the final ask. Bravo to Mpaltrow for pegging the price."

I think you tried to clarify the point with the second post but if not.....

The 'final ask' was modified just days before the closing to make it appear as if the buyer paid full ask. In reality, they lowered the ask price to match the sales.

The 'discount' to true last asking price was 12%. Gotta love the broker pricing gymnastics.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 16 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

I think it was just a glitch or typo at Halstead's end. The $2.2M ask wasn't fed to SE until the 6th, while the ACRIS docs are dated the 1st. Just somebody clicking the wrong checkbox, putting the 2.2 in the wrong field, or something. If Dean was going to fudge things like this he would've started before now and not been obvious about it.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment