<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sukenik=King of the Price Change</title>
    <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Most recent comments for Sukenik=King of the Price Change</description>
    <item>
      <title>MtRushmore: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.prudentialelliman.com/MainSite/PopUps/VideoClippings.aspx?clip=1"&gt;www.prudentialelliman.com/MainSite/PopUps/VideoClippings.aspx?clip=1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39556</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39556</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MtRushmore: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;insight
&lt;br /&gt;integrity
&lt;br /&gt;commitment
&lt;br /&gt;results
&lt;br /&gt;vision
&lt;br /&gt;determination
&lt;br /&gt;dedication&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39555</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39555</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MtRushmore: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;7 East 14th Street
&lt;br /&gt;epicenter of the downtown universe
&lt;br /&gt;PERFECT place to start your new life
&lt;br /&gt;"perfect NYC apt"
&lt;br /&gt;is for YOU
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39554</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39554</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MtRushmore: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;43 Clarkson Street  
&lt;br /&gt;grandeur and soul
&lt;br /&gt;Sprawling, sunblasted and cavernous
&lt;br /&gt;Dreamloft
&lt;br /&gt;chic, private location 
&lt;br /&gt;miles beyond your expectations
&lt;br /&gt;modern bling
&lt;br /&gt;every thing you are looking for...and more&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39553</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39553</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>october: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Fair enough - have a good weekend guys.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39529</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39529</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stevejhx: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, guys, just let me have some fun!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39528</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39528</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JuiceMan: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;remember october, that on average guys name stevejhx talk out of two sides of their mouths, so they must be wrong 100% of the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39526</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39526</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>october: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sigh - stevejhx:  1. I went to the realtor website - I don't see the term "new listing" - where is the false advertising?; 2. "material" misstatements in this context generally refer to the underlying product - I don't see any misstatement about the apartment itself; and 3. exaggerations in advertisement are perfectly legal - there is even a nice little term for it: "puffery."  But please - don't take my word for it - go hire a lawyer!  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39525</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39525</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>jordyn: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;"remember october, that on average all lawyers lose half their cases, so they must be wrong half the time."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry, Steve, but that is just dumb.  We have an adversarial system in which lawyers are required to zealously represent their clients.  So, the fact that a lawyer loses often has much more to do with the client and the case that they have than their understanding of the law.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even if your assertion that the "average" lawyer was wrong half the time, it wouldn't follow that any given lawyer is wrong half the time.  Some lawyers are obviously better and more correct than the average, and there's no reason to think that october isn't one of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39522</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39522</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stevejhx: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;remember october, that on average all lawyers lose half their cases, so they must be wrong half the time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"if such advertising is misleading in a material respect."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To show something as a "new listing" when it is not is "misleading in a material respect," is it not?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39520</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39520</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>october: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kylewest - I agree with you completely (except that I'm a lawyer).  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39519</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39519</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>kylewest: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW, this isn't illegal, in part because no one can detrimentally rely upon this price change info.  It doesn't communicate anything false about what is being sold or the price at which it is offered. It's deceptive if people rely upon the Elliman search engine to truly list newer properties first, but that isn't what consumer fraud statutes are there for.  Others are right that the price is what it is and that's that.  The problem is one of ethics and system gaming and unsavory-ness.  A sort of contempt shown for those who play by the rules.  But just because it makes Elliman's search engine coughs up the listing as new is hardly a cause for legal action.  Let's not get bogged down in this by non-lawyers interpreting the law.  It doesn't serve anyone on here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39515</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39515</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stevejhx: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;they're shown here, but not on the Elliman website where they come from.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'll make it easy for you:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"S 349. Deceptive acts and practices unlawful. (a) Deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any business, trade or commerce or in the furnishing of any service in this state are hereby declared unlawful."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"S 350. False advertising unlawful. False advertising in the conduct of any business, trade or commerce or in the furnishing of any service in this state is hereby declared unlawful."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"S 350-a. False advertising. 1. The term "false advertising" means advertising, including labeling, of a commodity, or of the kind, character, terms or conditions of any employment opportunity if such
&lt;br /&gt;advertising is misleading in a material respect. In determining whether any advertising is misleading, there shall be taken into account (among other things) not only representations made by statement, word, design, device, sound or any combination thereof, but also the extent to which the advertising fails to reveal facts material in the light of such representations with respect to the commodity or employment to which the advertising relates under the conditions prescribed in said advertisement, or under such conditions as are customary or usual."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since he's obviously trying to make the property look like a new listing on his website, that is mislabeling what it actually is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39512</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39512</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>october: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;stevejhx - the fact that all the prior price points are disclosed means that there has been no deception.  The broker is showing you that he is fishing.  It's not even close for common law fraud.  Please point me to the NY statute covering the false advertising laws and I'll run up to my firm's law library and take a look.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39509</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39509</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stevejhx: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;they're borderline, october, under ny's false advertising laws.  But they certainly are fraudulent in the sense of wrongful.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39506</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39506</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>october: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;stevejhx - I don't want to spend a lot of ink on it - but while the relistings are sleazy - they are not legally fraudulent.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39502</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39502</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>tenemental: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;re: seeming desperate&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The listing appears that way regardless of Sukenik's sales volume. I've known guys who are never longing for company, if you know what I mean, but they still seem desperate and pathetic at a bar hitting on every woman in sight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39499</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39499</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>drdrd: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When I see a lot of price changes like this, I always use the lowest price to determine what to offer so, yes, it seems this broker is not best serving the client.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39496</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39496</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>billshiers: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Much as I would prefer not to, I'm going to have to agree with VVerain here.  I don't believe that time on the market is a fundamental aspect of an apartment that a buyer has a right to know.  It is an indicator of the demand for that apartment which influences the bargaining power of the respective parties, but it is not comparable to other aspects of an apartment such as location, size, light, views or condition.  Nobody expects a seller of any product to fully disclose their bargaining position with respect to the product that they are trying to sell.  To use the car example again, if I was selling a used car and a potential buyer asked me how long I have been trying to sell the car, I would be completely comfortable telling the potential buyer that it is none of their business.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the real flaw in this approach is that Streeteasy seems to do a pretty good job of allowing a potential buyer to see through the charade and to discover the true age of the listing.  When I see an apartment that has been the subject of these kinds of price movements, it makes me think that the seller and broker are desperate to draw interest to the apartment.  This would either (a) make me think that there is something wrong with the apartment and avoid it or (b) cause me to make an extreme lowball bid if I was interested.  Those are not actions a broker should be trying to evoke in a potential buyer.  In short, I don't think these tactics are sleazy, but I do think they are stupid.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39473</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39473</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>kylewest: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The effect of unsavory broker practice is this:  if I am in love with the property, the sleazy or aggressive broker (call it whatever you want) will likely have little impact.  If I'm on the fence or mildly interested, these kind of tactics cause me to move on--who needs the headache of dealing with someone like this.   Thus, the broker is providing a disservice to his client.  Merely attracting attention is not enough.  Running around outside the building naked tyring to hand out flyers would attract attention, too, but that doesn't translate into sales.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39463</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39463</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apt_Boy: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You hire a broker to evaluate the market and propose a proper selling price based upon market conditions and recent sales.  If a property does not sell, the broker/seller should revisit that price at regular intervals (4/6/8 weeks) and determine if a price change is needed.  "Sukenik=King of the Price Change" is not doing that, as such he is not serving his clients honestly.  And as a buyer, you have no confidence in the asking price which will either force a buyer to do extra research or more likely ignore the property because of its uncertain price history.   &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39455</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39455</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stevejhx: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sleazy = sleazy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fraud is defined as:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1 wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. 
&lt;br /&gt;2 a person or thing intended to deceive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is clearly deception, and its purpose is to get people to believe that this property hasn't been sitting on the market for ages by claim that it's "new," and its purpose is clearly the personal financial gain of the listing agent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So not only is the action fraud, so is the person.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39439</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39439</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>lupus1: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;dude two investments, both have expected value of 745 and equal volatility,  one clearly has measurement error and the other not, which one would you choose ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39428</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39428</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VVerain: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have made no judgement on the price.  It may be overpriced.  The price it sells at will be the market price, and so far it hasn't sold at any of the prior listing prices.  But even if everyone agrees it is overpriced, including the broker himself, that doesn't equate to the broker or the seller being sleezy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And he is not selling a car where there are model years.  He is selling a piece of real property.  Is the year of development of the property relevant? ... sure ... but he isn't changing the year of the property's development.  Your example doesn't hold.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lastly, with respect to this accusation of "stale listing" ... so?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39423</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39423</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stevejhx: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;sleazy is as sleazy does.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;overpriced = overpriced.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can't sell a 2007 car as a 2008 just b/c it's been sitting on your lot for a year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"stale listing."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Caught.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39418</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39418</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>verain: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;no, not quite.  Despite your efforts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;still, no one has managed to refute: The price is $745K. If the price came down to $745 or went up to $745 or started at $745, it is still $745. Price is very simple. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;or: The recency of the listing does not change the fundamentals of the property.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39416</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39416</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stevejhx: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;He was probably banned as Verain.  :0&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39354</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39354</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VVerain: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;streeteasy posting name change wasn't intended to change any continuity of position (aka stripes) on my part.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39350</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39350</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>KISS: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As I said in the other thread, res ipsa loquiter.  Interesting that you changed your posting name.  Not so easy to change your stripes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39347</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39347</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VVerain: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, so there is only one legitimate point of view for this argument, because even if other side might have something logical (or illogical for that matter) to say, that person is invalidated at the outset before a case could be made based as that person is either vested/conflicted or unvested and therefore sad and a troll by simple virtue of disagreement with the original point of view.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39342</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39342</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>KISS: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I believe that this is the same Verain who defended CORE brokers' tactics on another thread (also ad nauseum).  As I posted then, he's a troll, since he disclaimed any CORE relationship (and thus removing any "rational" basis for his postings).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3332-core-marketing-group"&gt;http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3332-core-marketing-group&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39335</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39335</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>West81st: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;He's screwing his fellow Elliman brokers, whose legitimately new/amended listings get less attention because the "new listings" page is cluttered with junk.  Maybe they should all adopt his tactics, and render the page completely useless. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39323</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39323</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apt_Boy: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;VVerian - Why are you so interested in defending "Sukenik=King of the Price Change"?  You have already made 8 posts to this string.  Either you have a vested interest in defending him or have way too much time on your hands...either way, it is just sad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39318</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39318</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VVerain: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The price is $745K.  If the price came down to $745 or went up to $745 or started at $745, it is still $745.  Price is very simple. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39309</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39309</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>bjw2103: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;VVerain, you're right, it's not a big deal (and I don't think anyone equated this to an earthquake, but, uh, ok), but when you have the choice between a sleazy broker and a non sleazy one, this kind of bs stands out.  One particularly agressive/sleazy broker tried to ply his tricks on me way back when I was first shopping.  Those kinds of brokers make the whole process very unpleasant, that's all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39304</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39304</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stevejhx: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The recentness of a listing certainly does change the fundamentals of the PRICE of the property.  Otherwise, he wouldn't be doing it.  You can't sell a 2007 car as a 2008 car, even if it's new and unused, can you?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's fraud.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any honest realtor will warn you about a "stale" listing - one that's more than a few weeks old.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39302</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39302</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ccdevi: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I think this broker's actions are really lame and if I was his client I would be like what the F, but at the end of the day VV is right "the recency of the listing does not change the fundamentals of the property."&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39298</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39298</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VVerain: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The recency of the listing does not change the fundamentals of the property.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39274</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39274</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>stevejhx: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sleazy is as sleazy does.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because he didn't "change price from $749,000 to $745,000 and back."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;He changed from OLD LISTING to NEW LISTING.  Completely different.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ahole.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39245</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39245</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VVerain: about 6 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;oh crap ... earthquake kills thousands in China, and Darren Sukenik changes price from $749,000 to $745,000 and back.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39232</guid>
      <link>http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/3696-sukenikking-of-the-price-change?comment_id=39232</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
